Keyboard shortcuts

/ or ⌘/Ctrl K
Find a note
j / k
Next / previous section or linked note
h / l
Collapse or go to parent / expand or enter
e or Alt-click
Read a linked note here
o
Open focused note on its own
g g / G
First / last section or linked note
g h / g a
Home / all notes
g b / g t
Backlinks / table of contents
t
Cycle System, Light, Dark
? / Esc
Show / close this reference

Search: ↑/↓ or Ctrl N/P, Enter to open. Shortcuts pause while typing.

Zadrozna: Reconstructing the past in a post-Ottoman Village [45013a8e]

Tags: papers, Post-Ottoman Near East, europe, turkey

Talks about the "Memory House of Ataturk" (mustafa kemal) as a focal point for macedonian ethnic identities, utilization of Ataturk as a symbol and claiming him (either through his lineage or pan-Turkishness) to be a rallying point.

historical consciousness is not a homogenous but rather a multilayered and complex process which can encompass apparently contradicting narratives of the past, not only within one nation-state - pg 12

3 types of self identification:

  1. Macedonian
  2. "Turk" <- isolated to the Lower Zupa region
  3. Torbesi

Identities revolve around primordialist arguments but are linked to political ones:

"Macedonians" support Macedonian political parties, the majority of the "Turks" vote for the Democratic Party of the Turks, and the Torbesi support the Part for European Future - PEI, which have actively worked for the legal recongition of the Torbesi as a separate ethnic group - pg 4

1. Who own Ataturk?

  • Based on ideals that Ataturk's father was born in Kocacik, some groups claim ethic Turkishness