islamic jurisprudence lecture 12 [6a9a7657]
Tags: islamic jurisprudence
1. Peters - Crime in Islamic Law
1. Peters - Crime in Islamic Law
-
Chapter 2
- large amount of loopholes
-
question of theft
- tossing of necklace and
-
premodern scholars talk about zina hurts people who commit zina
- zina was happening in mecca and medina
- if it was happening in mecca and medina during the life of the profit, what hope is there
- outsourcing to the shurta/emir/sultan
- the idea that god is so sublime and without need that it is not necessay all the crimes against him be published
- the hadd crimes serve as a rhetorical device
-
can you go unpunished for murder?
- the rights of man and the rights of god
-
does the state put guardrails on power?
- does the lack of constraint on the state in sharia a realist understanding
-
the personalness means less punishment?
-
reprimand - the shame of being reprimanded
-
for the elite it shouldn't and doesn't need to be public
- "anticipatory shame"
- status discourse of moral formation - are elites thought to be a "moral"
- classifical fiqh treats social repute as an asset
-
- murder - if there are no heirs, the state is the plantiff
- transmogrifying into monetary fines
-
chapter 4
-
three ways islamic law is eclisped
- abolished completely (usually france)
-
- british sort of saw some aspects of islamic law, mostly that it was non-deterministic and the payment of blood money
-
british caring about limbs over life
- easier to forget the dead, the sight of the mutilated engenders moral outrage
- mini-theaters of punishment
-
transmogrify blood money into lengths of incarceration
- does blood money threaten the stabilty of the state?
- the discretion of the victim
-
the rape victim with the mahar
- victim made it stick - page 139
-
sisasa reform (ottoman, egypt)
- when did stonings stop? when did amputations stop?
-
2. eltantawi - Shariah on Trial
2. eltantawi - Shariah on Trial
-
how is she defining democracy?
- her interlocutor defines democracy as a
- reading by ache - the ways in which sharia was implemented there
- belief in the moral rengeration of society
-
sufi discourses -> being part of a tariqa -> disambiguating islamic teachings
- having a teacher that makes it monovocal for you
- when we search for multi-vocality, is that fundalmentally wrong?
3. kenthammer
3. kenthammer
- the sharia paradox
- when the discourse is more inclusive, do we believe its actually mono-vocal
- is this because non-learned voices are not part of the conversation?